From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 26 16:57:44 2006
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E092B16A403;
	Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:57:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk)
Received: from mx.nitro.dk (zarniwoop.nitro.dk [83.92.207.38])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D88943D45;
	Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:57:43 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk)
Received: from zaphod.nitro.dk (unknown [192.168.3.39])
	by mx.nitro.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E52386C48;
	Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:57:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by zaphod.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000)
	id E2E761142D; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:57:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:57:42 +0200
From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
To: Andrew Pantyukhin <sat@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20060926165741.GA8931@zaphod.nitro.dk>
References: <200609260527.k8Q5RG9C078413@repoman.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200609260527.k8Q5RG9C078413@repoman.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/vuxml vuln.xml
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:57:45 -0000

On 2006.09.26 05:27:16 +0000, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> sat         2006-09-26 05:27:16 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD ports repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     security/vuxml       vuln.xml 
>   Log:
>   - Update the unace advisory

Why did you add the Secunia advisory in the body?  Isn't it just
different wording for the same issues?

Also, it's generally a bad idea to use <ge> if the port isn't fixed
since you risk someone bumping port reversion etc. and therefor
marking the port as fixed when it really isn't.

-- 
Simon L. Nielsen