From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 12:07:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878B11065673; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:07:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from smtp.timeweb.ru (smtp.timeweb.ru [92.53.116.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4017D8FC25; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:07:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [213.148.20.85] (helo=hive.panopticon) by smtp.timeweb.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OeoMq-0004rl-Jg; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:07:12 +0400 Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.32]) by hive.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2474DB865; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:07:12 +0400 (MSD) Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0C509B84E; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:07:12 +0400 (MSD) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:07:11 +0400 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: Gabor PALI Message-ID: <20100730120711.GB94324@hades.panopticon> References: <201007300923.o6U9NC14039562@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100730111922.GA94324@hades.panopticon> <4C52BDA1.2020807@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C52BDA1.2020807@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/hs-darcs Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:07:15 -0000 * Gabor PALI (pgj@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > It is in progress. We already have an on-going discussion with Alexey, > but I have not had time to merge his recommendations, while I felt > important to update the ports until we reach a final consensus. > > I promised Alexey to CC you in my answer, which shall be written soon > :) The basic idea is still to go with split ports. Good, thanks. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru