From owner-freebsd-isp  Wed Feb  5 20:26:25 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA04674
          for isp-outgoing; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 20:26:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nero.in-design.com (root@nero.in-design.com [204.157.146.146])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA04668
          for <isp@freebsd.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 20:26:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nero.in-design.com (info@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nero.in-design.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA06618; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 23:26:39 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 23:26:39 -0500 (EST)
From: Intuitive Design Info <info@in-design.com>
To: Ron Bickers <rbickers@intercenter.net>
cc: isp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: senmail vs. qmail
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970205153846.8266A-100000@bigboy.intercenter.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970205232546.6612A-100000@nero.in-design.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 5 Feb 1997, Ron Bickers wrote:

> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 15:43:03 -0500 (EST)
> From: Ron Bickers <rbickers@intercenter.net>
> To: Intuitive Design Info <info@in-design.com>
> Cc: isp@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: senmail vs. qmail
> 
> On Wed, 5 Feb 1997, Intuitive Design Info wrote:
> 
> > Sendmail holes are endless.
> > is there anyway to have qmail to do virtual emails?
> > if yes, how have others found it's stability, etc?
> 
> I've been running qmail on FreeBSD and BSDI for many months now and have
> had zero stability problems.
> 
> I'm using the qmsmac package for virtual domain email and once you get use
> to the differences (and they are significant) qmail is a piece of cake to
> maintain.


	I looked on cdrom, and I couldn't find either package.  Could you 
give me a location where I could find both by any chance.

	Thanks
		Tamer Ziady