Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 08:08:19 +0200 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Proposal: do not show up the dialog(1) by default? Message-ID: <519DB253.9000205@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CADLo8387BXSpcxgkd9ivVuJX62KZNos8OP1bU0atFwb9REYKvw@mail.gmail.com> References: <20130523054541.GH96836@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <519DAF4C.9070702@FreeBSD.org> <CADLo8387BXSpcxgkd9ivVuJX62KZNos8OP1bU0atFwb9REYKvw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris Rees ha scritto: >> I find such behavior very useful, I find annoying the above behavior. If > the dialog will not pop-up if the only options are the global ones it'd be > much better, IMO. > > The correct solution to this is to not add those to DEFINE. *If* this is the correct solution, why for months we said committers to add them to DEFINE and now we have 50% ports with them and 50% without? There should be a clear definitive statement on this subject. I don't have a strong preference, but we should choose oon the two: 1) not list them in DEFINE 2) if DEFINE contains only them, not show the popup -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?519DB253.9000205>