Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:00:03 +0300 (EEST)
From:      Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua>
To:        Ian FREISLICH <if@hetzner.co.za>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Panic (in firewall while doing lots of ifconfigs)
Message-ID:  <20060829114401.O63269@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
In-Reply-To: <E1GHy6f-0002Nr-6c@hetzner.co.za>
References:  <E1GHy6f-0002Nr-6c@hetzner.co.za>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Hello!

On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> 2589                            case O_IP_SRC_ME:
> 2590                                    if (is_ipv4) {
> 2591                                            struct ifnet *tif;
> 2592
> 2593                                            INADDR_TO_IFP(src_ip, tif);
> 2594                                            match = (tif != NULL);
> 2595                                    }

    Looks like a lack of the proper locking against IP address 
addition/removal. These (O_IP_SRC_ME/O_IP_DST_ME), 
as well as matching of interface by IP address in the iface_match():

                 /* XXX lock? */
                 TAILQ_FOREACH(ia, &ifp->if_addrhead, ifa_link) {
                         if (ia->ifa_addr == NULL)
                                 continue;

are worrying for these races exist since version 1.1 of the ip_fw2.c
for more than 4 years! Alas I'm not an expert in kernel locking, that's why
I don't know how to correctly lock these places.

Sincerely, Dmitry
-- 
Atlantis ISP, System Administrator
e-mail:  dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua
nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060829114401.O63269>