From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 25 13:44:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32ECA106568B; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:44:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: from palm.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:613:100::211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC14D8FC26; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by palm.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5C1BC1CD58; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:44:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:44:47 +0200 From: Ed Schouten To: Brian Somers Message-ID: <20090825134447.GM2829@hoeg.nl> References: <20090825034054.2d57e733@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hdhkc9EpVJoq6PQ6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090825034054.2d57e733@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Ivan Radovanovic Subject: Re: Deprecating ps(1)s -w switch X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:44:48 -0000 --hdhkc9EpVJoq6PQ6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Brian Somers wrote: > I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the > originator) challenged my reason for closing it. >=20 > The suggestion is that ps's -w switch is a strange artifact that can > be safely deprecated. ps goes to great lengths to implement width > limitations, and any time I've seen people not using -ww has either > been a mistake or doesn't matter. Using 'cut -c1-N' is also a great > way of limiting widths if people really want that... >=20 > I'd like to propose changing ps so that width limits are removed and > '-w' is deprecated - ignored for now with a note in the man page > saying that it will be removed in a future release. >=20 > Does anyone have any objections to doing this? I don't propose > merging this back into stable/8. So ps(1) output can never be limited to the screen width? --=20 Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ --hdhkc9EpVJoq6PQ6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqT6s8ACgkQ52SDGA2eCwXfvwCdHEjIDmvn72ntNblALRmQ2nqc hBwAnizukr+XSXeZQgqYTekUXQEnVBxa =N1TT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hdhkc9EpVJoq6PQ6--