From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 8 15:53:47 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA24690 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 8 May 1997 15:53:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA24685 for ; Thu, 8 May 1997 15:53:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.60 #1) id 0wPc3z-0007G9-00; Thu, 8 May 1997 16:53:27 -0600 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: Alpha questions.. Cc: Chris Csanady , Brandon Gillespie , FreeBSD-Hackers@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 06 May 1997 21:21:00 PDT." <6888.862978860@time.cdrom.com> References: <6888.862978860@time.cdrom.com> Date: Thu, 08 May 1997 16:53:27 -0600 From: Warner Losh Message-Id: Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <6888.862978860@time.cdrom.com> "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: : Some of it, but there are other problems. For one thing, the NetBSD : code requires the SRM console to be installed and everyone now agrees, : for a variety of reasons, that the ARC console is the one to target. : This will affect the boot code rather significantly. And the VM code, since the NetBSD/alpha code and the OpenBSD/alpha code both use PAL codes from the SRM console to do various interesting VM things, which would have to be redone as well. Just to give another example. : P.S. And if you don't understand the difference between the SRM and : ARC consoles, please don't ask - I don't want to explain it and you : don't want to know. :-) He's right. You *REALLY* don't want to know. :-) Warner