From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Sep 10 17:45:18 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758)
	id 9990614F2E; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 17:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 703D51CD5B2; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 17:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kris@hub.freebsd.org)
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 17:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org>
To: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>
Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua>,
	Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: NetWare client in -current
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909102036590.4890-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909101744280.70376-100000@hub.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:

> > Okay. If that's the plan, then I don't have any objections.
> > 
> > I do hate the idea of having to reimplement samba because of the licensing
> > though - it already does quite a good job at SMB serving, it seems a waste
> > to duplicate the effort instead of just adding kernel support to the
> > existing code.
> 
> SAMBA implements an SMB/CIFS server.  We're talking about client support.

It also does that (smbclient), though not as an FS, and there's
sharity-light for a (n)fs interface.

Kris



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message