Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:23:25 +0300
From:      Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, markus@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cdparanoia patch for ahci(4)/siis(4)  (next version)
Message-ID:  <4A7C630D.6010500@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090807170426.GA4292@triton.kn-bremen.de>
References:  <20090806184510.GA12039@triton.kn-bremen.de> <4A7B3328.5020307@FreeBSD.org> <20090806200715.GA16313@triton.kn-bremen.de> <20090806222127.GB1940@triton.kn-bremen.de> <4A7BBA52.306@samsco.org> <4A7BD57E.3040201@FreeBSD.org> <20090807170426.GA4292@triton.kn-bremen.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Juergen Lock wrote:
>  One question remains tho:  What if someone connects a sata drive
> to a sas controller, will that still be XPORT_SAS then?  In that case
> I'd say we'd need to check for that as well, or maybe just assume there
> are no `real' sas optical drives and treat everything sas as sata here...

There is no precedent yet, but I think it should become XPORT_SATA. SATA 
and SAS drives work quite different from management point of view, 
especially when working with PMP/Expanders, so controller should report 
what exactly going on there.

-- 
Alexander Motin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A7C630D.6010500>