Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:57:11 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS patches. Message-ID: <20080728125711.GH2953@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <200807281454.36892.max@love2party.net> References: <20080727125413.GG1345@garage.freebsd.pl> <200807272034.01290.max@love2party.net> <20080728083303.GD2953@garage.freebsd.pl> <200807281454.36892.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 02:54:36PM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > On Monday 28 July 2008 10:33:03 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > Yes, it should fix most if not all 'kmem_map too small' panics, at least > > from what I tried. Tunning kmem_size is still needed to get better > > performance. > > With the i386 default settings it was not too hard to get the attached panic. > Some cpdup and rm cycles of src and ports to a single disk zfs pool. With > 512M I haven't been able to kill it, yet. I was probably too optimistic. The default kmem_size is probably just too low. I'm quite sure it would be too low even for Solaris. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFIjcInForvXbEpPzQRAml2AJsEuyTHdipqalyjOXKgsoYl/egUmgCgrhly fCZWeUt0yWgjylgRG7F1hOU= =OyQ3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080728125711.GH2953>