From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 5 12:15:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from freebsd.dk (fw-rl0.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABD137B416; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 12:15:32 -0800 (PST) Received: (from sos@localhost) by freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.3) id fA5KFUB68849; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 21:15:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos) From: Søren Schmidt Message-Id: <200111052015.fA5KFUB68849@freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: Remove non-FreeBSD code from fs's In-Reply-To: To: John Baldwin Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 21:15:29 +0100 (CET) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, bp@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: sos@freebsd.dk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It seems John Baldwin wrote: > Would there be any objection to removing all the non-FreeBSD code (such as the > #ifdef NetBSD stuff) from hpfs, smbfs, nwfs, and the like? We have already > drastically broken compatibility with other BSD's by replacing simple locks > with mutexes and the KSE changes. When I talked to Julian about this in > regards to the KSE changes, he said that NetBSD wasn't using the same versions > of the files and had already removed all the non-NetBSD stuff from their > versions. At this point the non-FreeBSD code has bitrotted and serves to > obfuscate more than anything else. Comments? You have my go-ahead... -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message