From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 15 10:32:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA26377 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 10:32:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net (porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net [206.64.4.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA26372 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 10:32:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) Received: from localhost (bright@localhost) by porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA06517; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 13:34:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) X-Authentication-Warning: porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net: bright owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 13:34:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Alfred Perlstein X-Sender: bright@porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net To: "Marc G. Fournier" cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upping process limits... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG afaik the defualt is smaller than what you have in place in place now. Alfred Perlstein - Programmer, HotJobs Inc. - www.hotjobs.com -- There are operating systems, and then there's FreeBSD. -- http://www.freebsd.org/ 3.0-current On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > I wish...I'd also have to play with getting the right versions of CAM put > into it and all that...I'll end up having to upgrade eventually, just was > hoping to avoid for a couple of months :( > > Should I get rid of the *SIZ values altogether, in favor of login.conf, or > is there a 'default ceiling' in place? > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message