Date: Thu, 24 Aug 1995 01:48:30 +0200 From: "Julian Stacey <jhs@freebsd.org>" <jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu Cc: ports@freebsd.org, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, phil@gmrs.isar.de Subject: Re: pbasic-2.0-950813.tar.gz + pbasic-2.0-950813.src.tar.gz uploaded Message-ID: <199508232348.BAA06348@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ports Readers: My request for comment on the draft pbasic port is now _Terminated_ Satoshi, As you generated much more email for me than I could possibly want, I now hand the job over to you in entirety: You are now responsible for commiting a ports wrapper, & maintaining Phil Cockroft's Basic on FreeBSD. If you refuse, I am prepared to commit a tree alone, unaided, & without further input from _anyone_. I am also prepared to commit nothing if the ports@freebsd group prefers that. I am not prepared to be micro-managed, or to spend further time on this little ports wrapper, the efficient way forward is for one person to commit something, without further fuss & comment, it can be fiddled with later as required. I require a straight decision : Do you accept this job ? (with MAINTAINER = asami in the Makefile) Do you refuse it ? Do you nominate a 3rd person ? Do you agree I have carte-blanche for an inital commit ? (with MAINTAINER = jhs ) I will delete my freefall:~jhs/pbasic* sources if I don't get a simple answer. I get a prevaricating answer. I provided the ports wrapper for purely altruistic reasons: - Phil's a friend - I'm involved with FreeBSD - Some guy on ports@ asked for a Basic, I don't even Want basic myself, it's to provide choice for our user base, not me. My interest & enthusiasm is now exhausted. I await your commits of Phil's Basic to the ports/lang/ code tree. Julian S jhs@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508232348.BAA06348>