From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 8 23:52:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DC716A402; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 23:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp7-g19.free.fr (smtp7-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1174913C46B; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 23:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org (unknown [82.233.2.192]) by smtp7-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBC75508; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 00:52:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93BFA11B37; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 00:52:33 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at xbsd.org Received: from smtp.xbsd.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv1.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PXMY+1Y4wG+s; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 00:52:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from [193.120.13.130] (cream.xbsd.org [193.120.13.130]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5324D11ADC; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 00:52:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45CBB6B4.7050407@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 23:48:04 +0000 From: Florent Thoumie User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070122) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brooks Davis References: <20070129000459.b2dba4e0.nork@FreeBSD.org> <45C757FA.2000209@FreeBSD.org> <20070205163646.GB48768@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <45C75E1F.2070709@FreeBSD.org> <45C77AFD.1050801@FreeBSD.org> <45C77B9B.20403@FreeBSD.org> <20070205190220.GA51379@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <45CB9C44.8010207@FreeBSD.org> <20070208224659.GA96852@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <45CBB2A1.706@FreeBSD.org> <20070208234737.GA98583@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <20070208234737.GA98583@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig44FBBDEA77F2D581571B4587" Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton , freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org, Norikatsu Shigemura , FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/104884: Add support EtherChannel configuration to rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 23:52:35 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig44FBBDEA77F2D581571B4587 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 11:30:41PM +0000, Florent Thoumie wrote: >> Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:55:16PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: >>>> Brooks Davis wrote: >>>> >>>>> The default should be an empty list which results in nothing happen= ing. >>>>> I'd suggest making empty list the value for the default gif_interfa= ces >>>>> in /etc/defaults/rc.conf in both branches, removing support for NO = in >>>>> CURRENT and emitting a warning in stable. >>>> How about issuing a warning for NO in both branches? Whether I agree= >>>> with you or not on the importance of keeping things clean and >>>> consistent, I definitely do not want to err on the side of pedantry >>>> over usability. >>> That would be fine. I don't really care as long as it's deprecated. >>> >>> FWIW, only users who don't update /etc/defaults/rc.conf or who manual= ly >>> set gif_interfaces=3D"NO" would be effected so the size of the set of= >>> effected users is probalby close to epilon and even all that will hap= pen >>> is cloning an extra interface and then not configuring it so it shoul= d >>> be basicly harmless to just remove direct support for it. >> Fine with me as well. Should we make it a warning on RELENG_6 and an >> error on HEAD, or a warning on both. The former being be what I was >> planning to do, ie. remove support for "NO" in HEAD but issue a messag= e >> saying semantics have changed. The latter would mean identical code in= >> both HEAD and RELENG_6 (so "NO"-compatibility in both branches), but >> we'd need a reminder to remove this "NO"-support in HEAD once RELENG_7= >> is branched. >=20 > I'd say a warning in both. Re-reading Doug's message, he's probably thinking the same thing, but this is for gif_interfaces only, right? --=20 Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer --------------enig44FBBDEA77F2D581571B4587 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFy7a0MxEkbVFH3PQRCrFIAJ9oelmuwW66WzTncTrqPQspTLfpjQCeOq42 FihB34D9SR37ISDNpVn2aeU= =PAkV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig44FBBDEA77F2D581571B4587--