From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 12 11:27:11 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA26128 for current-outgoing; Mon, 12 May 1997 11:27:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA26121 for ; Mon, 12 May 1997 11:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA07885; Mon, 12 May 1997 11:20:48 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199705121820.LAA07885@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Regression tests (was Re: A 3.0-current SNAP building machine has been found!) To: perhaps@yes.no (Eivind Eklund) Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 11:20:48 -0700 (MST) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, perhaps@yes.no, terry@lambert.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199705120138.DAA11210@bitbox.follo.net> from "Eivind Eklund" at May 12, 97 03:38:32 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > It sure would be. Pity it's such a hard problem to ensure that > > everything is still obeying all the right flags and still generating > > all the right output. :( > > Depends a bit on whether the design is done to make it easy to verify, > but in the general case, I agree. However, a framework and just a > regression for parts would still be an improvement. Get TET/ETET working. It's free for download. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.