From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 17 17:17:06 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA20168 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 17 Mar 1996 17:17:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA20162 for ; Sun, 17 Mar 1996 17:16:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from msmith@localhost by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) id LAA21999; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 11:59:48 +1030 From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199603180129.LAA21999@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: CFV: adding phk_malloc to -stable To: stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua (Andrew V. Stesin) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 11:59:48 +1030 (CST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199603172215.AAA08726@office.elvisti.kiev.ua> from "Andrew V. Stesin" at Mar 18, 96 00:15:44 am MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Andrew V. Stesin stands accused of saying: > > this topic raises again and again, I personally asked (twice?) > to do so, but my gentle request was bounced by -stable maintainers. > > PLEASE, everyone who thinks that having phk_malloc in -stable is > A Good Thing (tm), second me; let's ask -stable maintainers > to drop it in! NO IT IS NOT A GOOD IDEA! This has been discussed to death. I love phkmalloc, and I use it all the time, but making it a standard part of -stable would be BAD. > With best regards -- Andrew Stesin. -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control (ph/fax) +61-8-267-3039 [[ ]] Collector of old Unix hardware. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[