From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug 24 13:08:05 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A6E5462;
 Sun, 24 Aug 2014 13:08:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 122E63AB1;
 Sun, 24 Aug 2014 13:08:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MRoyH-1WsZTP0cO1-00SyuS; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:08:02
 +0200
Message-ID: <53F9E3B7.10009@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:08:07 +0200
From: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org>, Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Berkeley DB 4...4.7 port removals/upgrades may require
 manual preparation
References: <53F640EF.7000200@FreeBSD.org>
 <20140824102826.GB9400@home.opsec.eu>
 <EB2B24ED-1D62-467B-8870-EEACA8A72281@freebsd.org>
 <20140824111149.GD9400@home.opsec.eu> <53F9CEDA.4070309@gmx.de>
 <20140824142050.5e336477@bsd64.grem.de> <20140824123006.GE9400@home.opsec.eu>
 <20140824143728.0d5c435b@bsd64.grem.de>
In-Reply-To: <20140824143728.0d5c435b@bsd64.grem.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:F3TeF9ZS/1zxjL81NfYUZd6tzGCyLN94x5zLn9HISgObn7/VKBv
 MYPN5v7vaSqeHWan8Vc9IykNwNn1x4mBWRUPrj7AhpoTAZkBMm49SjpPvzNwkkiZkyB2WLz
 nmrtNb4TjQSL/pnjLefaovdxQhHFErRhCuUhz98FExnjOha9jxXwQLxXO1J7GxqdLm9BQbI
 Nxqoag8GdLGI66JPAxeEw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Cc: ports-list freebsd <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 13:08:05 -0000

On 2014-08-24 14:37, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:30:06 +0200
> Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> wrote:
> 
>> Hi!
>>
>>>> Hm, using USE_BDB=$numble looks wrong to me in devel/ice.
>>>>
>>>> Can you test the following patch.
>>>>
>>>> Index: Makefile
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- devel/ice/Makefile    (revision 365910)
>>>> +++ devel/ice/Makefile    (working copy)
>>>> @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@
>>>>  .endif
>>>>
>>>>  USES=                  iconv gmake
>>>> -USE_BDB=               5
>>>> +USE_BDB=               yes
>>>> +WANT_BDB_VER=          5
>>>>  INVALID_BDB_VER=       40 41 42 43 44 46 47 48 6
>>>>  USE_LDCONFIG=          yes
>>>>  BUILD_WRKSRC?=         ${WRKSRC}/cpp
>>
>>> @Kurt: Could you test and confirm? If this works, I'll commit the
>>> patch.
>>
>> Yes, it builds.
>>
> 
> I created a commit request
> 
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D679
> 

Kurt, or you can commit this even w.o. PR.
The patch does not break anything but allows the port to build as required.
I assume there are even more easter eggs in the tree, specially for USE_BDB.

-- 
olli