From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 27 19:43:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43796819 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 19:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3E1B2E8C for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 19:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s4RJhMD6093359 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 May 2014 13:43:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) with ESMTP id s4RJhMxx093356; Tue, 27 May 2014 13:43:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 13:43:22 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Matthias Gamsjager Subject: Re: Hardware for NAS/NFS? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <648572.59917.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <0D64DBBA-2B34-40ED-87AB-D65DFDD5319E@jboy.eu> <7342945D-506C-4FAB-8644-9B0BFF76BE6E@if.ufrj.br> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 27 May 2014 13:43:22 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 19:43:24 -0000 On Tue, 27 May 2014, Matthias Gamsjager wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Matt Bettinger wrote: >> +1 For netapp under support with flash cache etc. > > > Wouldn't a TrueNAS from IX give you the same? ZFS with SSD caches and support? Consider also that the ZFS drive array could be taken and used on a FreeBSD system. Can NetApp's filesystem be mounted on another host if the NAS hardware fails?