Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:37:31 -0500 (EST)
From:      "Questions" <questions@totaldiver.net>
To:        "pete wright" <nomadlogic@gmail.com>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Dual boot problems
Message-ID:  <1214.192.168.1.2.1171420651.squirrel@mail.totaldiver.net>
In-Reply-To: <57d710000702131808k251b3309y6010322c7b8a5d30@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <1159.192.168.1.2.1171417443.squirrel@mail.totaldiver.net> <57d710000702131808k251b3309y6010322c7b8a5d30@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 2/13/07, Questions <questions@totaldiver.net> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> This weekend I purchased a laptop with a core2duo processor. The laptop
>> came with windows Vista premier. Due to some applications that I
>> require,
>> removing Vista and installing FreeBSD is not an issue. (Please leave the
>> Vista/Microsoft flames at the door)
>>
>> When I install FreeBSD/i386,  I can then install grub (instead of
>> FreeBSD's bootloader) and I can have grub "chainload" the Vista
>> bootloader.  All works fine.
>>
>> However,  when I try FreeBSD/amd64, grub won't compile (it's
>> architecture
>> is forced to i386 only in the Makefile.  I haven't dug into why, but I'm
>> confident there is a reason. Obviously, grub becomes a non-option.  Gag
>> has the same limitation of being i386 only.
>>
>
> to make sure i understand this correctly, you can install FreeBSD
> (assuming 6.1-RELEASE)/amd64 on your system but am having problems
> compiling grub in this environment from the ports tree?
>
> it looks like grub may only build correctly on i386 systems, but you
> may be able to define your cpu as a 32bit arch in /etc/make.conf while
> trying to build grub to see if that works.  i've never had to do this
> though, but it's worth a shot.
>
> -pete
>
>
> --
> ~~o0OO0o~~
> Pete Wright
> www.nycbug.org
> NYC's *BSD User Group
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
> !DSPAM:4,45d26f9c8487852311823!
>
>
>

Thanks for the fast reply, Pete.

It's actually 6.2-RELEASE/amd64, and I have tried compiling grub with the
pentium3, and pentium4 CPUTYPE's in /etc/make.conf, to no avail.   Sadly, 
it seems as though vista has code in the MBR now, that seems to be part of
the bitlocker stuff.  FreeBSD's standard bootloader interferes with it,
causing Vista to give a error message about files being corrupted.
Maybe there is a "simple" (to the MBR guru types) that could be
implemented into the fbsd bootloader.

-Jeff Palmer





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1214.192.168.1.2.1171420651.squirrel>