Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:48:18 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NOT installing the .la files Message-ID: <20060616154818.GA25414@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20060616152208.GA24948@soaustin.net> References: <200606112110.39148@aldan> <200606141616.21658.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <200606160816.44477.lofi@freebsd.org> <200606161102.58509@aldan> <20060616152208.GA24948@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Mark Linimon wrote: > With nearly 15,000 ports, certain compromises have to be made to make > the maintainance tasks easier, even if that costs some inodes. (The > Ports Collection is not optimized to minimize inodes ATM anyway). This > is one such compromise. > > As far as I am concerned, this needs to end the discussion so we can go > back to working on the harder problems. How do we go about changing ports? Do .la-only changes need the PORTREVISION bumped because the pkg-plist necessarily changed? Should we (I'm wearing my porter's hat now), submit .la-only changes? -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060616154818.GA25414>