From nobody Mon Apr 7 04:11:51 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ZWG503wDxz5sbrs; Mon, 07 Apr 2025 04:12:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yb1-xb32.google.com (mail-yb1-xb32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "WR4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZWG4z66Hdz3Pvh; Mon, 07 Apr 2025 04:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-yb1-xb32.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e60aef2711fso2628909276.2; Sun, 06 Apr 2025 21:12:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1743999138; x=1744603938; darn=freebsd.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=F31X8zORrNL/03tzgEubKak+OevOW2RWpE29N3+XOmk=; b=UnkD/DS5f4VRsUYrbi2mPW4JuIfvGJZUlmMlLyteGAU6FYBkXRkbWdUUSbiZkeClrM +xOuwKAkOhkXrcrNE0cNHYZoCsnxPi5PPYphXwYKkQRBL/q48dcf/5NgxEpgMxZnrRQh yR9/26WJnEquCNvmUViKYueoJztj/We/HIc6UA57qaQGUJgkXdTTe8evOEurlc+Q9xr2 a9MOwyD5VIEGNiFX6HVzp+pNJibG5zcq9fWxSAOlukiSD6gyogtFif72WH9cueTyY6Nb 3IlEEUNG8AACEdmCFOisOOOcxd3+f7Xs0R7/MGKhRs1jZFjJo5BWzqOJ+ceAKfdKostW xvgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743999138; x=1744603938; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=F31X8zORrNL/03tzgEubKak+OevOW2RWpE29N3+XOmk=; b=nxtpsz5VX4zyoxVqy02JAUH45vD95uo/pKqtj9CrxrktO1RhT6J4rF/nF4/bAFtjx0 fiBi8lEvcqpbPXzLNiKzGnrid8yzpNRhGQbix2FNeDmBd3IX+dE0xCpAddnI+N+PWrX7 y9EK4ZK/N8Ph+QRcP7B7MWeVH2uq7zCQJQA3WfrgwwBN47kgMC8mk2mh0occxHmH5fdT 2KKI3Ddqrse7EkO3dz5YU6KNzNf1oaOaD00GHpp6iI6XXpna3NzyEta5WerCarDLztII mrK7JykPIwBJEcz80j8c/qzHHCccoEHYy3vJV+683GruzlnZmqaV9l8tnEfWnZYw8m3E p3Ug== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVLjQz1e/CBe+U0HuYXPd597VQ0Qsfs8pYVf4imYNEH/CF5n0DsXJBeyjV+78c6B1copE9EP+4CguJx4ZAm@freebsd.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzNixHZlI4Dkne7S+EbnN5woGyrAHC42bYyxZCGemjtwszOpj27 NXx//vkQNjmWHoRFub2XbdrfRHTT7o07sx3aAYZvKDjjK6bcIoxTkPrVj651jmBIDtG9sn3mWFa TSiu7duPqAmbCxA9qDRteqiERZol7+1op X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs7qRdv20RBGWJfubRU38DtlzI/Xvoz7BgSa4GWIuh/ertm1I8PS8PZsLklkx1 FfG7XzEbmLKZPSHEv+8x7I8wLGLtITH2vUguMvQqKZl0LRjUoWpWd/go6eKn+HYlGrfrHWNm7fY dtjV9d3tUxbCWUUd9T34hp9uIC X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHN1tUmg666EoK6xBNdyHam39AVir0mZs+375tzDTl62aziFKkw8sCjn/M6ppRttw+woy5NRxRyHnzZIIvRL28= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:1b01:b0:e6b:81a8:bf8a with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e6e1f9de421mr16928544276.24.1743999138538; Sun, 06 Apr 2025 21:12:18 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8E2FBAD3-EF6F-4D99-A340-21F8FD19AE0F@yahoo.com> <84FBBAF8-025E-4B9D-9797-51735567A8DB@yahoo.com> <366E27FD-FA5B-4BF8-B6C4-6C495DB289C5@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <366E27FD-FA5B-4BF8-B6C4-6C495DB289C5@yahoo.com> From: Gleb Popov <6yearold@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 07:11:51 +0300 X-Gm-Features: ATxdqUFiaEW7hT20IDGe52jIj9fqEQMH-DXGDeyJS0TusOlULdwDw5PGDwE8Ctw Message-ID: Subject: Re: UPDATE: pkg 2.1.0 looks to be making official bulk builds of packages take much longer [it is more complicated then that for aarch64] To: Mark Millard Cc: FreeBSD Current , FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4ZWG4z66Hdz3Pvh X-Spamd-Bar: ---- On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 2:44=E2=80=AFAM Mark Millard wro= te: > > So: 2 min 31 sec or so difference for overall somewhat over an > hour, i.e., 151 sec or so. That is under 1 sec per package > built. If the slowdown comes from handling shlib provides/requires, then this obviously depends on the amount of dependencies of a given package. It might be as fast as before for a package with just handful of required shlibs, but get exponentially worse for giant ports with a lot of deps.