From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 10 20:09:50 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A39A16A404;
	Thu, 10 May 2007 20:09:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk)
Received: from virtual.micronet.sk (smtp.micronet.sk [84.16.32.237])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA82813C447;
	Thu, 10 May 2007 20:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2EFB10E820;
	Thu, 10 May 2007 21:40:39 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at virtual.micronet.sk
Received: from virtual.micronet.sk ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (virtual.micronet.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id Aij4zfVCpLxn; Thu, 10 May 2007 21:40:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.50.0.2] (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254])
	by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F2510E81C;
	Thu, 10 May 2007 21:40:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Daniel =?UTF-8?Q?Ger=C5=BEo?= <danger@rulez.sk>
To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070510175210.GD1835@zaphod.nitro.dk>
References: <20070510134740.GA39021@FreeBSD.czest.pl>
	<20070510175210.GD1835@zaphod.nitro.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 21:41:35 +0200
Message-Id: <1178826095.6150.0.camel@danger-pc>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 10 May 2007 23:27:02 +0000
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Wojciech A. Koszek" <wkoszek@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: We don't really need two FTP daemons
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 20:09:50 -0000

On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 21:52 +0400, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> On 2007.05.10 13:47:40 +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> 
> > Could we decide if we really want to support lukemftpd(8) ?
> 
> Hey,
> 
> I think only having one ftpd in the base system would be a very good
> move.  Both with my doc hat (I have seen mails about the different
> config files etc.) and with my secteam hat (we have less software to
> support).
> 
> Personally don't care much which ftpd is removed, but unless lukemftpd
> has some big important feature(s) which is useful to many people I
> agree lukemftpd is the obvious one to nuke.
> 
> So FWIW, a big vote from me to remove one ftpd.

+1 !

-- 
Best Regards,
Daniel