From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Mar 1 16:43:30 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA09074 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 16:43:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from caipfs.rutgers.edu (root@caipfs.rutgers.edu [128.6.37.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA09064 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 16:43:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from jenolan.caipgeneral (jenolan.rutgers.edu [128.6.111.5]) by caipfs.rutgers.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA08766; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 19:43:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by jenolan.caipgeneral (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id TAA09413; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 19:43:05 -0500 Date: Sat, 1 Mar 1997 19:43:05 -0500 Message-Id: <199703020043.TAA09413@jenolan.caipgeneral> From: "David S. Miller" To: julian@whistle.com CC: hackers@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <3318A3B6.41C67EA6@whistle.com> (message from Julian Elischer on Sat, 01 Mar 1997 13:46:30 -0800) Subject: Re: overview of socket hashing changes, plus new patch Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Date: Sat, 01 Mar 1997 13:46:30 -0800 From: Julian Elischer David (Miller) Are you on any FreeBSD lists..? Yes I am. There has been some discussion going on and I am so encouraged by what seems like a civilised proffesional dialog between Linux and BSD camps on this topic that I just want to make sure that we endevour to keep the lines of communications open. I was actually impressed with the lack of fiery response when both my postings got forwarded here. ---------------------------------------------//// Yow! 11.26 MB/s remote host TCP bandwidth & //// 199 usec remote TCP latency over 100Mb/s //// ethernet. Beat that! //// -----------------------------------------////__________ o David S. Miller, davem@caip.rutgers.edu /_____________/ / // /_/ ><