From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 27 21:41:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7567DF8D; Tue, 27 May 2014 21:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x233.google.com (mail-qg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29C6C2913; Tue, 27 May 2014 21:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id q107so15141816qgd.24 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:41:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mphzv6zLys+iqt5SFO5ojXfUhW65uXGYBRUz9ttGYpc=; b=RJhi0v8wrLSQ0rpyGCylRfPcCX/RwIXjr8zcUfU44hOsWq9+oaM2pnrpEwvcNEwJ05 0ddTZkDBbGG8kTFga3C8A3/J9zcpLpn6mWJVpIEud3GtmxBJm2HgoJ5H57ZnqqqnZX1c 15pV1ERmrnLuZP/6Cb+ypW3qvjry81Bsj3aowl2hwhQRPjhkJXUagktsEIEMj9FPG54h 3/6mMmy8F/nml3+qfqchaJCjStZ1nCVBxGvYoGeR5MBV813JJPUEYvCR75PmpEjZL0b9 U2/G/ipdsuvAb5OtI5+332FpFJnGNeoz9cjmNiPGc8Fj24KlW5cNASNSzpVZQ5pE4h04 i8+w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.212.196 with SMTP id gt4mr21627502qcb.18.1401226861330; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:41:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: carpeddiem@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.49.239 with HTTP; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:41:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 17:41:01 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: seFVa6ppDwdgKVVghkrEpWBR6JQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD-10.0r. on Lenovo G780 (fwd) From: Ed Maste To: Victor Sudakov , FreeBSD Questions , Aleksandr Rybalko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 21:41:02 -0000 > OMG. The console font looks terrible (too small). And it has become > Unicode. Personally I prefer the crisp (and yes, small) console font over a blurry stretched 80x25 console, but we will add larger font bitmaps as well. Sample versions have been posted to one of the mailing lists already. We'll also add different fonts in case you don't like Terminus. Unicode support is one of vt(4)'s benefits (screen maps not required); is there a reason you'd not want it? Keymap support (via rc.conf settings) is not yet available but will come soon. - Ed