From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jul 10 19:09:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B1599730E for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:09:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pavel.odintsov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB4B2F27 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:09:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pavel.odintsov@gmail.com) Received: by wiwl6 with SMTP id l6so54477878wiw.0 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:09:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=BbHWaIfXMO1536yEWZyH5dxg7h9bzysNhxAKHQhUCBM=; b=eG9ntIa6EEJprO12pxNfedJVh+Zz0q///4a7+LX0159DdxOJ64y17eD1J96jfwyKyZ /r1Cvspt0tHmE8Qb36RtgtUCNPO2Qd52W1JWLy3Q4tKiFk0jfpD/T3eKM5EZmcQ+Ian+ f3XDwRJo+SSk9v5XETfRjJ+w9gV5MRNE2cRq3mwraBLrJyAUm5x3BlPQUXMVmitpIiNM aq1+9tdBr74hLAFMnrfQF8vdc0/SAkaIKlOPBuTCGLcnxFmz+UUABPCsRpetdAGDWPr6 oiF6GZEy9evgtunQd4DXrVcjLeZWzFg1DX+Z4MfXfVxhsi+AfdTB09njE5YXxAYX1I5N +amA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.100.104 with SMTP id ex8mr46392269wjb.69.1436555382123; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.138.84 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:09:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:09:42 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: netmap-ipfw: kipfw two instances sharing same port From: Pavel Odintsov To: Eduardo Meyer Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:09:44 -0000 Hello! You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance of kipfw on each pair: kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1 And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on Linux netmap). On Friday, July 10, 2015, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > Hello, > > should ./kipfw and another ./kipfw work? > > I want to have two filtered kipfw instances sharing the same WAN port. > > So far I did a quick test lab and it worked, but since it's a lab > environment I don't know if I should expect other problems when I add it to > run in a real scenario. > > What problems should I expect? Can they be minimized? > > Basic stateless filtering only. > > -- > =========== > Eduardo Meyer > pessoal: dudu.meyer@gmail.com > profissional: ddm.farmaciap@saude.gov.br > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > -- Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov