From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 4 14:23:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from www.menzor.org (themoonismadeofgreenchease.dk [195.249.147.160]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B0D15138 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 14:23:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ml@seeberg.dk) Received: from SOS (fwuser@gw.danadata.com [194.239.79.3]) by www.menzor.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id AAA20788; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 00:59:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@seeberg.dk) Message-ID: <004501bf5701$d9863ba0$1600a8c0@SOS> Reply-To: "Morten Seeberg" From: "Morten Seeberg" To: "Oliver Fromme" , References: <200001042210.XAA35202@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de> Subject: Re: Script to run at bootup Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 23:20:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.5600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.5600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Tony Wells wrote in list.freebsd-questions: > > Has the use of /etc/rc.local been deprecated since 3.0-STABLE? > Yes. In fact, much earlier than that -- it has been > deprecated and obsolated in 2.x-stable days. > Use /usr/local/etc/rc.d instead. I never even knew this, will I risk loosing rc.local in the future??? Itīs so easy to use, just add a line and thats it. I know Im lazy, but why should rc.d be better? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message