From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jan 8 15:22:55 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA10654 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 15:22:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp02.primenet.com (smtp02.primenet.com [206.165.6.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA10649 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 15:22:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert@usr05.primenet.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp02.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA06419; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 16:22:03 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr05.primenet.com(206.165.6.205) via SMTP by smtp02.primenet.com, id smtpd006366; Fri Jan 8 16:21:53 1999 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr05.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA19744; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 16:21:36 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199901082321.QAA19744@usr05.primenet.com> Subject: Re: Strange warnings when compiling Berkeley DB on FreeBSD 3.0 To: jb@cimlogic.com.au (John Birrell) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 23:21:35 +0000 (GMT) Cc: db@abyssinian.sleepycat.com, jb@cimlogic.com.au, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, openldap-devel@openldap.org, yusufg@huge.net In-Reply-To: <199901082229.JAA00644@cimlogic.com.au> from "John Birrell" at Jan 9, 99 09:29:09 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Linking against both libc and libc_r will cause strange results. > Using gcc -pthread is the correct way. Why? Is libc weak symbol support broken, or is libc_r incomplete? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message