From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 4 06:48:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424B916A4CE; Tue, 4 May 2004 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8BD43D4C; Tue, 4 May 2004 06:48:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd.org (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.0.11]) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i44Dqpu6018563; Tue, 4 May 2004 07:52:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <40979F29.1070102@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 07:48:25 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040304 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andre Oppermann References: <200405040239.i442dfL0011742@repoman.freebsd.org> <40970329.3070507@freebsd.org> <40975C30.5D247B83@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <40975C30.5D247B83@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net if_vlan.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 13:48:47 -0000 Andre Oppermann wrote: > Scott Long wrote: > >>Scott Long wrote: >> >> >>>scottl 2004/05/03 19:39:41 PDT >>> >>> FreeBSD src repository >>> >>> Modified files: >>> sys/net if_vlan.c >>> Log: >>> Add route.h to pick up the rt_ifmsg() declaration. >>> >>> Revision Changes Path >>> 1.60 +1 -0 src/sys/net/if_vlan.c >> >>Not to pick on anyone in particular, but we've had about three days in a >>row now with tinderbox failures. Please, everyone, step back and be >>more careful. Thanks, > > > Scott, I'm sorry for that. > > However it worked for me just fine. The reason I just found out is that > I wasn't compiling if_vlan into the kernel but loaded and tested it as > module. Compiling it as module doesn't give any compiler warning and > works w/o a hitch. Dunno why? > No worries. This is a common problem and is something that practically everyone falls victim to once in a while. I don't know why the module building path is different from the kernel building path, but I think that once Peter is done overhauling both that it will become a lot more consistent. Scott