From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 27 10:31:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF0E16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 10:31:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [206.71.64.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C6A43D49 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 10:31:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.247.57] (helo=[192.168.99.66]) by hobbiton.shire.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.10) id 1BIWQg-000GGZ-00; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:31:34 -0600 In-Reply-To: <87fzaplop0.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <87fzaravaj.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <200404261342.48970.h@schmalzbauer.de> <8A17357B-978A-11D8-91B5-003065A70D30@shire.net> <87ad0yquql.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <00a201c42c18$c23818b0$0c00a8c0@artem> <87fzaplop0.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613) Message-Id: From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:31:30 -0600 To: Florian Weimer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on hobbiton.shire.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_44 autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Level: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: 'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORGORG' Subject: Re: Jail organization X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 17:31:35 -0000 On Apr 27, 2004, at 4:06 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > "Artem Koutchine" writes: > >>> However, there was a nasty bug in 5.x (5.2?) which caused lots of >>> crashes/stuck processes (at least for me). >> >> Was it ever fixed? I am planning on setting up about 10 virtual server >> on the office freebsd server and need to know if there is any problem >> with jail in 5-CURRENT. > > At least one bug has been fixed since 5.1: > > 000401.html> > > Does anybody have suggestions for my original problem? > Where in /usr do most ports want to touch? if you mean /usr/local you can make that NOT part of your shared directory structure. I mount /usr/bin /usr/sbin etc all separately... Or just tell people that if they want to install ports they have to do it with an alternative location Chad