Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 14:45:46 -0700 From: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> To: Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: name of a port that builds on 10-CURRENT but not 9? Message-ID: <CAN6yY1spB0x-S3NN4Q-foajXGwuixOBKMHOYZ_5aUz67AS0Zzw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGBxaX=-5-ESUTJsC%2BwXcWs3XKc8RoiXW_U5YspJw0NXeXjV%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAGBxaX=-5-ESUTJsC%2BwXcWs3XKc8RoiXW_U5YspJw0NXeXjV%2Bw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>wrote: > I am making a port and need to see a good working example of how to > make it so it will not compile on less then 10-CURRENT > What exactly do you mean by 10-CURRENT? Head today, head this year, head since 9 was branched? In any case, check OSVERSION. A great many ports may be looked at for examples. E.g. graphics/blender. See the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook 12.6. There is a list of every OSVERSION bump, but I can't remember exactly where it is, but to check for 10, check if OSVERSION >1000000. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1spB0x-S3NN4Q-foajXGwuixOBKMHOYZ_5aUz67AS0Zzw>