From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Apr 12 12:58:53 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA18657 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 12:58:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA18647 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 12:58:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (narvi@localhost) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id WAA09891; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 22:57:10 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 22:57:04 +0300 (EEST) From: Narvi To: Amancio Hasty cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 430TX ? In-Reply-To: <199704120117.SAA07293@rah.star-gate.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Sorry, I snipped the CC: list quite a bit... - hope no one get offended On Fri, 11 Apr 1997, Amancio Hasty wrote: > >From The Desk Of "David Langford" : > > Main point is that I think even motherboard makers could be more helpful > > in improving memory usage. I would pay a premium for a high bandwidth > > motherboard, but I dont see a point in spending $750 for motherboards that > > perform just like the $200 boards... > > > It is call lets charge to the hilt for our hardware mistakes . > > Oh, Don't forget that 64bit PCI based motherboards have not come out yet > so guess what? 8) Well, there are at least for PowerPC - the Motorola Atlas(?)/ MTX motherboard has one 64bit slot and 2 32-bit slots. I guess all that is needed for a PC chipset having 64 bit PCI is a CPU-host controller, interfacing anything else (including ISA?) to it using Digitals 64/64 and 64/32 PCI bridges. Sander > > Cheers, > Amancio > > >