Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:37:17 -0500 From: stan <stanb@panix.com> To: Free BSD Questions list <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: imap question Message-ID: <20040224023717.GB29444@teddy.fas.com> In-Reply-To: <20040224022809.GB70587@keyslapper.org> References: <20040224003846.GB25902@teddy.fas.com> <20040224010221.GA70587@keyslapper.org> <20040224012915.GA27408@teddy.fas.com> <20040224022809.GB70587@keyslapper.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 09:28:09PM -0500, Louis LeBlanc wrote: > On 02/23/04 08:29 PM, stan sat at the `puter and typed: > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 08:02:22PM -0500, Louis LeBlanc wrote: > > > On 02/23/04 07:38 PM, stan sat at the `puter and typed: > > > > I'm trying to help a firend of mine get an imap server running on one of > > > > his FreeBSD 4.9 STABLE machines. > > > > > > > > We have built the UW imapd port, and installed it. However we seem to be > > > > habing a bit of a problem making it work. > > > > > > > > Tha man page, and the docs (which I only found in the ports work directory > > Yes and no. POP is fine if you only ever check mail from one system. > Otherwise, imap is more appropriate. Security is a separate issue > altogether when you look at it this way. > > Good luck. > Thanks for the help. -- "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040224023717.GB29444>