From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 20:49:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF79106568E for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 20:49:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D508FC2B for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 20:49:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 30078 invoked by uid 399); 2 Jun 2009 20:48:57 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.100?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 2 Jun 2009 20:48:57 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4A259039.8040001@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:48:57 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruben van Staveren References: <4A257B82.1000701@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:49:07 -0000 Ruben van Staveren wrote: > Being a bit of my own devils advocate here, network_interfaces="AUTO" is > already true for ipv6. FYI, ipv6_network_interfaces exists for this purpose. Thanks for your post, it's good information to add to the pile. Doug