From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 15:39:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA01916A4D0 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:39:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch [62.48.0.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD8043D70 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:39:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 40438 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2004 23:39:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) ([62.48.0.53]) (envelope-sender ) by mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 6 Jan 2004 23:39:41 -0000 Message-ID: <3FFB473C.34E44597@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 00:39:40 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200401062329.i06NTk5U036884@repoman.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet tcp_input.c tcp_subr.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 23:39:53 -0000 Andre Oppermann wrote: > > andre 2004/01/06 15:29:46 PST > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/netinet tcp_input.c tcp_subr.c > Log: > Enable the following TCP options by default to give it more exposure: > > rfc3042 Limited retransmit > rfc3390 Increasing TCP's initial congestion Window > inflight TCP inflight bandwidth limiting > > All my production server have it enabled and there have been no > issues. I am confident about having them on by default and it gives > us better overall TCP performance. > > Reviewed by: sam (mentor) Please report anything that might relate to these options being enabled to me for investigating. Things like sudden drops in tcp performance and such. Somewhere we have to give it greater exposure and that is what -current is for. However I'm confident that there are no issue with these options. I've looked hard on the code and run it here for a long time. -- Andre