From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jan 23 09:06:24 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA29644
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 09:06:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA29639
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 09:06:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id JAA23916; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 09:48:21 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199701231648.JAA23916@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Commerical applications (was: Development and validation
To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams)
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 09:48:21 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, nate@mt.sri.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com,
        hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199701230232.TAA28344@rocky.mt.sri.com> from "Nate Williams" at Jan 22, 97 07:32:28 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> [ Voting ]
> > 
> > Question: How will it generate work?
> 
> There is absolutely *NO* reward for agreeing to implement what the users
> vote for.

Ah.  Here is where you screwed up.  Voting does not force implementation
agreement on anyone.  It only controls the focus of the organization
as a whole.  Focus != implementation.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.