From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 25 08:40:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A82316A4B3 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 08:40:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6476743D46 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 08:40:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4P8eRNQ031149 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 08:40:27 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k4P8eQ4A031148; Thu, 25 May 2006 08:40:27 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 08:40:27 GMT Message-Id: <200605250840.k4P8eQ4A031148@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Kris Kennaway Cc: Subject: Re: kern/97595: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE - "lockmgr: locking against myself" X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kris Kennaway List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 08:40:28 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/97595; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kris Kennaway To: Roman Petrukhine Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/97595: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE - "lockmgr: locking against myself" Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 04:39:00 -0400 --MnLPg7ZWsaic7Fhd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 08:38:50AM +0000, Roman Petrukhine wrote: > An attempt to use union_fs in 6.1-RELEASE > produce a "panic: lockmgr: locking against myself". > I know about union_fs instability, but from early 4.x to 5.3-RELEASE=20 > all of this works fine and stable, and used by me to manage read-only sys= tem > binary tree under user's jails. This will not be fixed as such, since the CVS implementation of unionfs is dead and broken. However you should try the rewrite that is available as an uncommitted patch (search the fs@ mailing list archives), and report further problems to the authors. Kris --MnLPg7ZWsaic7Fhd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEdW0jWry0BWjoQKURAgW0AJ4vJKWzyPsYPaUoUrn8UHK6EF4jbwCgp152 561+aMIbxBOrpv82/g4wBNE= =/6nX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MnLPg7ZWsaic7Fhd--