From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 9 18:53:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2761065672 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 18:53:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034418FC08 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 18:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so1494733pbb.13 for ; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 11:53:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=fphsndS4kGiV4VXDMffcQpyaG2RrhWQE2PJZa1Xjtqk=; b=WAOg8zQ3AK6cbjh/EyjhGAkP922kJo0P2pncXEJOYsUoJm6fhHym/qqRbTeIKaO196 jBHkwRwN6EYEY2XmSBzTmzZdW1+L80m5/FKzF4d+MYG1hWmJTCYDWXD2GwUhtZF7YZLk yPQgxigI/Bz2S6Fe4sz5rdbeC5nHDHdfBtraU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=fphsndS4kGiV4VXDMffcQpyaG2RrhWQE2PJZa1Xjtqk=; b=UrmxqpALARyUr63MZvDncu3WEhjAyCPuWjJHoOkI8ZHSJPtb+CU+ZYuZt9t0RkQDh3 MNrAhzjCEPsluWV4RNLn3CKqYzXQfr2gSO8bQk1g4igUqWSn5WcOOCkYlpF4B2UQ4sBp kMtJCT10vih13hTkX0fHWq28ZZz+MbHdBCffzWr9XzcIU8ynh9VmW6maoTlQQ5qVjdM4 ama5uY4+xHBZ5qUj4j2AEmHRbLwwphT0Qu7fmJBzHxhqQ6WEhdDyZo/UUqEAjLqGGYdB 1lfihUN3T/ATefZDt261Ik3ToenHbYVaI3HUsGNpijYrNEYgkqT4cxtNVvIO9QgDgiKy Gtmg== Received: by 10.68.224.73 with SMTP id ra9mr1510969pbc.85.1347216807476; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 11:53:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.193.101 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 11:52:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120908234659.GA10489@server.rulingia.com> <504BD9B5.20001@shatow.net> <504BE020.1070300@FreeBSD.org> <504BE12A.50907@shatow.net> <9A528A3C-40F1-4599-ACAB-EF306033A4F2@bsdimp.com> <86pq5vtj42.fsf@ds4.des.no> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 14:52:56 -0400 Message-ID: To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkJQYnQQRehrWutnTLl8xGir7ebu+1CKdHLavhGlQOFXE54SzFHUQ4EXwBhmc90OuzqRlVC Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removing CVS from HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 18:53:28 -0000 On 9 September 2012 13:54, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > We, btw, also still have multiple active cvs repositories used by the > project, both external and internal, so claims that we don't use it > anymore are not true;) By the time that 10.0 is released this will no longer be true. > I think people are working on the internal > ones to fix this already. I shouldn't mention it but projetcvs still > needs to be migrated somehow. I even mentioned projectcvs in my original email. > I'd suggest going ahead in small steps; fix development.7, fix release > man page and scripts, fix Makefile.inc1, ... in HEAD to no logner know > about CVS, fix ports like freebsd-uucp to no longer depend on it, ... I have a patch for development.7 and am working on some other areas too. > Once this is all done and base is basically clean, and an exp run for > ports was done, come back and see. An exp-run won't catch run errors. cvs *build* dependencies should be rare or non-existent, but I agree one would be needed. > Everything else is the wrong order > anyway. What do you mean? > This will also give other a proper longer term heads-up to see how > much work it'll take them. I don't mind committing in parts. However I'm not sure exactly what this buys us given that it would be gone in 10.0 in any case. -- Eitan Adler