Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 May 2003 09:34:53 +0300
From:      Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
To:        Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
Cc:        freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Strange systat output on SMP FreeBSD 5.0-Current
Message-ID:  <3EC4868D.8030409@he.iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <20030515213906.GO23782@dan.emsphone.com>
References:  <XFMail.20030515164618.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <068401c31b23$9c4d1ad0$c02a40c1@PETEX31> <20030515213906.GO23782@dan.emsphone.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Nelson wrote:

>per-cpu utilization should be even across all CPUs, since our
>schedulers do not do process affinity and are not HT-aware.
>
>  
>
That would be true if there would be no interrupts and no kernel time.
With them the system spends more time with one/some of the CPU's.
(or  systat lies, but I don't think so)

This is also why HT does not perform well if you have a lot of activity
that is behind an exclusive lock.

Pete




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EC4868D.8030409>