Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 14:52:56 -0400 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removing CVS from HEAD Message-ID: <CAF6rxgmAeLKr%2BRQW8QkVzD5LsuEqoqnHXmbeK7X0txvLcrmzEg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209091747060.13080@ai.fobar.qr> References: <CAF6rxgnZGjzm230sZXVXxmE7wPowF_BZqbwRjdvz8oV-03gS=A@mail.gmail.com> <20120908234659.GA10489@server.rulingia.com> <504BD9B5.20001@shatow.net> <504BE020.1070300@FreeBSD.org> <504BE12A.50907@shatow.net> <9A528A3C-40F1-4599-ACAB-EF306033A4F2@bsdimp.com> <86pq5vtj42.fsf@ds4.des.no> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209091628400.13080@ai.fobar.qr> <CAF6rxgnN6GL38o=7LHnGLR-copo=FCpDObxu4SR5PK9yzMNemA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209091733410.13080@ai.fobar.qr> <CAF6rxgnDXVY3oJY7jmF0nL6enX0B38kR5eJWRhehZF=oR2CbUg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209091747060.13080@ai.fobar.qr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9 September 2012 13:54, Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > We, btw, also still have multiple active cvs repositories used by the > project, both external and internal, so claims that we don't use it > anymore are not true;) By the time that 10.0 is released this will no longer be true. > I think people are working on the internal > ones to fix this already. I shouldn't mention it but projetcvs still > needs to be migrated somehow. I even mentioned projectcvs in my original email. > I'd suggest going ahead in small steps; fix development.7, fix release > man page and scripts, fix Makefile.inc1, ... in HEAD to no logner know > about CVS, fix ports like freebsd-uucp to no longer depend on it, ... I have a patch for development.7 and am working on some other areas too. > Once this is all done and base is basically clean, and an exp run for > ports was done, come back and see. An exp-run won't catch run errors. cvs *build* dependencies should be rare or non-existent, but I agree one would be needed. > Everything else is the wrong order > anyway. What do you mean? > This will also give other a proper longer term heads-up to see how > much work it'll take them. I don't mind committing in parts. However I'm not sure exactly what this buys us given that it would be gone in 10.0 in any case. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgmAeLKr%2BRQW8QkVzD5LsuEqoqnHXmbeK7X0txvLcrmzEg>