From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 24 12:00:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF01116A4DC for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:00:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20DF043D6E for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:00:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: (qmail 25486 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2005 11:55:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130) by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 24 Feb 2005 11:55:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 24217 invoked by uid 89); 24 Feb 2005 12:05:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 24 Feb 2005 12:05:20 -0000 Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21EDA114EC; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:00:24 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:00:23 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Christian Damm Message-ID: <20050224140023.35d627dd@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <421D59C8.2080209@diewebmaster.at> References: <20050223110037.177AB43D2F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <421C8A60.8010407@diewebmaster.at> <20050224004857.7413d567@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <421D59C8.2080209@diewebmaster.at> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SpamAssassian with FreeBSD and Big Mail Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:00:47 -0000 On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 05:36:24 +0100 Christian Damm wrote: >=20 >=20 > Ion-Mihai Tetcu schrieb: > > On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:51:28 +0100 > > Christian Damm wrote: > >=20 > >=20 > >> > >>Vahric MUHTARYAN schrieb: > >> > >>>Hi Everybody ,=20 > >>>=20 > >>> Really I don't know can I say a big mail server which have > >>>30,000 mailbox on it 1200+ simultaneously connections (pop,smtp,webmai= l). > >>>=DDncoming smtp connections are between 200-400 . We want to run spam = software > >>>on it but machine can't handle it for this reason we seperated machine > >>>freebsd+exim+SpamAssassian but on 400 connection machine goes down ave= rage > >>>is very high , cpu usage really too high .=20 > >>>=20 > >>> I want to learn Anybody Who have closer or bigger system a= nd > >>>using SpamAssassian ?!=20 > >>>Really this 400 connection simultaneously can be limit for spam softwa= re ?! > >>>I mean Anybody can handle more ?!=20 > >>>I have to design distributed environment ?!=20 > >>>=20 > >>>My Hardware is (for spam) > >>> 2 X PIII 1G + 1 GB RAM + 2 DISK RAID 0 SCSI 10000 RPM =20 > >> > >>i use spamassassin only on small-/medium-sized MTA installations (its a= =20 > >>memory/cpu hog i.m.h.o. but i like it) - on all my "bigger" systems i=20 > >>really prefer dspam (coded in straight C and fast as hell). it is used= =20 > >>in some environments with 350,000 email users and scales really well (i= f=20 > >>you have the iron and experience to build/maintain such a system/cluste= r). > >> > >>http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam/ > >=20 > >=20 > > Also in ports: mail/dspam and mail/dspam-devel (updates for both in not > > committed PRs). > >=20 > > I'm currently playing with a setup like OP's. I'm interested in knowing > > our definition of "iron and experience to build/maintain such a > > system/cluster". >=20 > your definition? - or my definition? ;-) :-) sorry, typo. Yours. And while we're at definitions - what's small / medium and what's big :-) ? --=20 IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"