From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 13 02:30:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D32106564A for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 02:30:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rafaelhfaria@cenadigital.com.br) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE958FC17 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 02:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so6578532wyb.13 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:30:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.46.15 with SMTP id q15mr3593871web.103.1284343269443; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:01:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.160.75 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:00:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C8D234F.40204@quip.cz> <201009121640.39157.josh@tcbug.org> From: Rafael Henrique Faria Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 23:00:39 -0300 Message-ID: To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: FreeNAS vs OpenSolaris vs Nexenta ZFS Benchmarks X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 02:30:20 -0000 On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 21:15, Freddie Cash wrote: > > Using which target (iscsi-target or istgt)? Or are they both slow? > > This is a good question. I know that iscsi-target (ported from NetBSD some time ago) is too old, and don't respect the current iSCSI protocol. But the new implementation from Aoyama (istgt) is a lot better, and I don't know if the tested FreeNAS was already using the istgt. I am using istgt a while, and have some problems with it, and don't know about the performance... if someone have any notice about it... will be very good. -- Rafael Henrique da Silva Faria