From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 27 03:15:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3157916A402 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 03:15:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris#@1command.com) Received: from mail.1command.com (mail.1command.com [216.177.243.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C2613C484 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 03:15:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris#@1command.com) Received: from mail.1command.com (localhost.1command.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.1command.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l0R3ERD6078390 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:15:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris#@1command.com) Received: (from www@localhost) by mail.1command.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id l0R3ERdG078389 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:14:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris#@1command.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.1command.com: www set sender to chris#@1command.com using -f Received: from demon.dnswatch.com (demon.dnswatch.com [216.177.243.42]) by webmail.1command.com (H.R. Communications Messaging System) with HTTP; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:14:26 -0800 Message-ID: <20070126191426.md1bqabhusksckcs@webmail.1command.com> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:14:26 -0800 From: "Chris H." To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20070126171218.2k25n1tt28c08wow@webmail.1command.com> <45BABDBF.2090601@andric.com> In-Reply-To: <45BABDBF.2090601@andric.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: H.R. Communications Internet Messaging System (HCIMS) 4.1 Professional (not for redistribution) / FreeBSD-5.5 Subject: Re: Why does FBSD always assume it's on an 8080 CPU? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 03:15:56 -0000 Quoting Dimitry Andric : > Chris H. wrote: >> I've noticed building kernels, that since v. >= 5 that during >> the phase 2/3 all the lines echoed to the screen contain: >> -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 ... > > See /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf. Sigh, the obvious is so /easily/ overlooked. Thanks for the "heads-up". :) That helps quite alot. --Chris > > >> As Pentium have been the "norm" for many years now, why aren't >> these /assumed/? > > Because i486 is still the lowest common denominator, at least for 6.x. > > >> Default? hmmm... not as far as I can tell. Anyway, I would *greatly* >> appreciate any insight on this issue. Do I need to pollute my make.conf >> file to achive a Pentium kernel? > > Yes. Is this so horrible? > > -- panic: kernel trap (ignored) ----------------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p12 (SMP - 900x2) Tue Mar 7 19:37:23 PST 2006 /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////