From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 02:09:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from chateau.d.if (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6C51065679; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:09:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ashish@freebsd.org) Received: from chateau.d.if (chateau.d.if [IPv6:::1]) by chateau.d.if (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57E545612; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:39:38 +0530 (IST) From: ashish@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) To: Lawrence Stewart Organization: Lost Case References: <4D44FD91.7070607@freebsd.org> <86r5buec8e.fsf@chateau.d.if> <4D45F219.6070207@freebsd.org> X-Face: )vGQ9yK7Y$Flebu1C>(B\gYBm)[$zfKM+p&TT[[JWl6:]S>cc$%-z7-`46Zf0B*syL.C]oCq[upTG~zuS0.$"_%)|Q@$hA=9{3l{%u^h3jJ^Zl; t7 X-Uptime: 7:24AM up 13:30, 11 users, load averages: 0.12, 0.17, 0.11 X-URL: http://www.lostca.se/ X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE/amd64 X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0 X-Attribution: =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3?= Organisation: Lost Case Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:39:33 +0530 In-Reply-To: <4D45F219.6070207@freebsd.org> (Lawrence Stewart's message of "Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:19:53 +1100") Message-ID: <86ipx5esde.fsf@chateau.d.if> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJ1BMVEWpqal/f39tbW1jY2Md HR2goKCenp6UlJROTk7////9/f35+fnT09ORJdieAAACVklEQVQ4jXXUP2vbQBQA8AvUTkgz5OzY Z0iGWhpS6BSrkECn0mvx0MEJ6AjtYrfoBCVDlD8naJYmNlRfwZq8+mkKlIZaGpJSYmP7Q/XkJDrJ Td8i/H68u3vHPaPufwLdf32AMA4A6GcAgvAamY1pOJiDIFqicTwLswDhfr3uxfFtkAY/GFHPMwzD 8zpnACmIOnE6js7rQb+v4NJrG9od0C+QgpHMy5jBewV+UDSMWiw1Y4fWfyV7+NGFzDsYa3pth9LJ Q4XvXxFHcJRvHOmygn5NAEabnDcQQguarnfoiwSCJ99jmKKcphsZONmWsDK9Ro7cvZOCtQdg8nje egLhc2LNlkLmsezzTFUUy5w18ocox/f0LaLgJy0zO75zk+9pp85GAj36xjqhdI0y3tq2m4dqqcWX zQWBTz8L1irvolXV4J+3q7eCDgVnttjNq6X8H+9KOZsuNk1uCzx8pSp+E9HImfJOTLdcGqo+YKnG EIovizkEn48V7BO+ch2DXcD4ENSpWiU+q8hjjbgTBZCXnZtyj0Ws4Q1Q0B2WXFtYZo65Bbyeeldw RS6qFueM80LlLA29YlVwGRYvFD+kwI/0O+A2PlpOP9GwslUVciHuYGechuBTp922YiDZCrghTknm XSyOM+D3aoRZlo0Jb42zY7DN4p2x4AeZ+QAYutx1sHwTHzMT5cMNduQ9yW3GczN4KZ86kb0c9O8T yXDeFqpl2fryPEAYGXIlezAPXYh2NgVr/gvdoHIuDwuPwOhcWE8f8mmICq41eATkn8x0kuRTIKcB wE9+/QUtiiAnYcaN7wAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Ashish SHUKLA , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding a PAM config option to net-im/ejabberd X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:09:41 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lawrence Stewart writes: > On 01/31/11 00:45, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: >> Hi Lawrence, >>=20 >> Lawrence Stewart writes: >>> Hi Ashish, >>=20 >>> What do you think about applying the attached patch to the ejabberd >>> port? It installs some parts required to allow ejabberd to auth against >>> PAM and is working great for me. >>=20 >> Sure, I can apply it, once ports freeze is over. I also need to update >> ejabberd. I'll do both together. > Sounds good, thanks. One question: in order to get PAM auth working, you > have to set uid root on the epam bits and chown them appropriately in > order to allow things to work. Should the port installation process do > these steps as well or should we leave them to the user? I would be > inclined to have the port do them so that upgrading the port doesn't > break PAM auth after the upgrade. We would want to print a big warning > at the end of the port install about the set uid security aspects though. Thanks for the mention, I suggest adding mention of setuid bit in the description of the OPTION. And ofcourse port is going to set the setuid bit during installation. And `security-check' target in bsd.port.mk will catch the setuid bit set on the installed executable, and will inform the user as well. So, adding a warning about setuid bit be redundant, IMHO. Thanks =2D-=20 Ashish SHUKLA =E2=80=9CShe dump(8)-ed me without caring to restore(8).=E2=80=9D (abbe, 20= 05) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJNRhniAAoJEMdGz6nnT6Sw7usP/RgAO0tLwUm7K4Yp247PLuT7 /G/MQicPolh7w0QZc+tNrH59008u6iNlz4AiFORaN+8pfhU20PAq3odsftujAwzm zXH1+S5nRmjRevQpk3mOzb7yf0AIJr6NTVnn3OSWQldzDVvaIKbRmmXSsp7Vvked myVMEpdwl0bCZdEGuwz/J9CD+vt3Py7Z8WOAq9z3XOd0P9qoQ4F/Wv4ut+gOrPAA OEToevVapWCwaxNKHLWjJPUV5q6j6kO1GQ6vBJw+vzo9RFlMsR9Wj+EUmHvIQm8o /qlpxlDI29bbJGfPQT+7PvIQDkojg5hJkUgEERuHbVkTSPDUS93CVovxuSqMFAr0 W90JSmEptcJbqNX5Veg6l9tX9JTSC2TwjEMz6MB69DFW62WI371z5R+7XGrAckbB YS2q0h3qHwbOdSG42Vd1LraDzwbebTb8trKIrYP7RPsqcuGQHXCkhLXlkUmXfr7C fP4j21DVCgdqZuKdmoFRW3GiJnmEroWDgEkCtpRvTYX9kGatGtkV3vL8WB73cvzl rNKjbhZT/Z5WSwWacpfxkGghcThnmGc2xwBnkmZtDyauSmB5tgsKC12w5CAzLyGH fBncbDBTdqNM9/EoUAj0WGsVa99LgDt42SnBjMmqGum46LmhdqVkX02K49mQ10Om +O6E7G1qJiWb6LQ9xK4N =UTSY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--