From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 29 19:45:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1569316A41A for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:45:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from mail.sweeplist.com (mail.sweeplist.com [77.93.199.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD6813C45B for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:45:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (r3a200.net.upc.cz [213.220.192.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sweeplist.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C17167875; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:45:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <479F825A.9040200@quip.cz> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:45:30 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Amesbury References: <478FBC91.1060606@umn.edu> <479F5CF4.4020000@umn.edu> In-Reply-To: <479F5CF4.4020000@umn.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UCD-MIB for bsnmpd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:45:26 -0000 Alan Amesbury wrote: > Alan Amesbury wrote: > > [snip] > >>I'd like to run bsnmpd, but need the UCD-MIB for other performance >>monitoring. I could run net-snmp and proxy requests through it to >>bsnmpd, but that strikes me as inelegant. There's a bsnmpd-ucd module >>at Google >> >> http://bsnmp-ucd.googlecode.com/ >> >> >>which is seems to work, except for some minor bugs in what it reports >>for laLoadFloat.[123]. Have any of you experience with this? Are there >>plans to add it to the ports tree? > > [snip] > > Since no one else responded to this thread, I'm assuming I'm the only > one using this feature... at least on *this* list. :-) For what it's > worth, v0.1.3 appears to work as expected. I've been able to narrow > down some performance problems on one of my systems. (It appears to be > dropping packets when traffic exceeds ~120Kpkts/sec, vs. its near twin > which seems fine at ~190Kpkts/sec). > > It'd still be nice to get bsnmp-ucd into the stock ports tree, though, > as I think other people might eventually benefit from it. Should that > request be done through a PR? > > As always, thanks in advance! I am not using bsnmp-ucd so I will not help you with problems. If you want it in the ports tree, I think the best way to do it is contacting the author of bsnmp-ucd to ask him to do the port / submit it (by PR) to the official ports tree. Or you can do it your self and submit it and be the maintainer of the port. Once it hits the ports tree, it gets better attention and bugs will be (can be) fixed faster. Miroslav Lachman