From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Dec 15 21:06:35 1996
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id VAA06898
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 15 Dec 1996 21:06:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA06893
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 15 Dec 1996 21:06:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.8.3/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id FAA25471; Mon, 16 Dec 1996 05:06:19 GMT
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 14:06:19 +0900 (JST)
From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
To: Robert Nordier <rnordier@iafrica.com>
cc: toor@dyson.iquest.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Warning -- Lite/2 merge coming up
In-Reply-To: <199612160450.GAA00822@eac.iafrica.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.961216140011.25400A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 16 Dec 1996, Robert Nordier wrote:

> > Do the merges include lock_mgr and simple_lock, etc.?
> > 
> > If so, then MSDOSFS would have to be changed to lite2 conventions.  Doug
> > posted some guidelines on the lite2 list.  I guess I can forward these to
> > Robert Nordier if he's around.
> 
> Thanks.  I've done the lock changes in the new DOS FS (vfatfs).  If
> necessary, I don't mind adding these to the MSDOSFS.

Umm.  Almost sounds like we can nuke MSDOSFS.

Just thinking out loud,


Mike Hancock