From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 00:09:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2710716A41C for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 00:09:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tim@spyderweb.com.au) Received: from levanto.mail.adnap.net.au (levanto.mail.adnap.net.au [203.6.132.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C294743D4C for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 00:09:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tim@spyderweb.com.au) Received: from bofh.spyderweb.com.au (219-90-232-28.ip.adam.com.au [219.90.232.28]) by levanto.mail.adnap.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1BE5AA5 for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 09:39:40 +0930 (CST) Received: from bofh.spyderweb.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.spyderweb.com.au (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4U094Ml065894 for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 09:39:05 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from tim@spyderweb.com.au) Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 09:39:04 +0930 From: Tim Aslat To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050530093904.232a6ae1@bofh.spyderweb.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20050529231226.GK61821@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20050529231226.GK61821@wantadilla.lemis.com> Organization: Spyderweb.com.au X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.11 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: drivers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 00:09:44 -0000 On Mon, 30 May 2005 08:42:26 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > Nowhere is a good place to send 10 MB of illegible log output. Please > don't. I agree. > Do you really expect people to read this? It's incorrectly coded, and > it's far too long. Many people pay for their mail; you have cost me > personally $2.00 to download this message. Knowing what kind of setup you have Greg, I can believe that. Although it has opened up a rather large can of worms. Can the list maintainers restrict message sizes to less than a meg? I honestly can't imagine any possible reason for sending an attachment larger than 500K (shar files, etc) to a public mailing list. Is it worth looking into doing this, or am I barking up the wrong metaphor? Regards Tim -- Tim Aslat Spyderweb Consulting http://www.spyderweb.com.au Phone: +61 8 84193434 Mobile: +61 0401088479