Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:33:35 +0200 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, Antonio Olivares <olivares14031@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Why Clang Message-ID: <20120621003335.ce64ea73.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206210023450.1403@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org> <CAH3a3KWKNF5Bt-8=KgtbMh=rV6GfUO7OaeE6-SutxkcRe8cG3Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191953280.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20120619205225.21d6709f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20f61898ce668c96f8882981cf8e24f6@remailer.privacy.at> <4FE1AD27.8000704@gmail.com> <CAH3a3KWHYC%2BpbkdQWF4Pfqv=W0Ldzo8q4T8Ta5wgsryocxNFuA@mail.gmail.com> <1340192731894-5720039.post@n5.nabble.com> <4FE1BD0E.5060300@pukruppa.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201416540.24484@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2B0MdpOftiWE%2B1Gqn5USxu87RPB_7WAGTXnOGU0dp99CMXMYTw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201644190.1476@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CAJ5UdcOwD-gpw548fkHnuzUp3R%2BwTOPvna5Z8J079T4VVKGB=A@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206202204520.3174@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20120620224030.1a0dc3b4.freebsd@edvax.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206202353080.1403@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20120621001809.da9ce415.freebsd@edvax.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206210023450.1403@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:25:22 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > You're being paid to write a program for a customer. You > > i don't talk that case, but if i am hired to write some part of program as > an employer in software company. Sorry, I misread the situation. In this case I assume that any half-baked employer will have a specific clause in the contract that will cause that all your creations will be attributed to the employer immediately, the wage being an act of selling your intellectual property (if this term applies here, not sure, it's widely stressed) to the employer who becomes the new "owner" and "creator on behalf". It's also possible that similar content can be present in a contract between client and customer (just like between employer and employee). I highly assume that if such a clause is _not_ present, the "natural and normal interpretation" appears, i. e. you are the creator, copyright is yours. Even if it sounds strange, it still can apply in an employment setting. But as I said, contracts and local law may have some regulations that applies. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120621003335.ce64ea73.freebsd>