From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Dec  3 05:08:35 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA10906
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 05:08:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA10887
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 05:08:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.3/8.6.9) with ESMTP id FAA06180; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 05:08:26 -0800 (PST)
To: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: 2.2ALPHA Question 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Dec 1996 06:30:54 CST."
             <l03010900aec9ccdc0ced@[208.2.87.4]> 
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 1996 05:08:26 -0800
Message-ID: <6177.849618506@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> >> If fixes are available, how will they be delivered for testing purposes.
> >> CTM, CVS ??
> >
> >CVS for now, CTM I'm not sure about.
> 
> Jordan, are you behind the times or are you telling me that you intend to
> drop the support for ctm? You, personally, set up the stuff to provide the
> archive access for 2.2 almost a month ago.

No, just overloaded.  Not being an actual CTM *user*, I'd long since
forgotten about this. :-)

					Jordan