Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 02:24:55 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204594] math/py-networkx: Update to 1.10 Message-ID: <bug-204594-21822-AwqECDiCeK@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-204594-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-204594-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594 --- Comment #19 from John W. O'Brien <john@saltant.com> --- @rm: For those who get as far as building with poudriere, fiddling with options seems almost like a given. The reason I prefer the latter option is because the former option will result in a package that claims it was built with option X, yet option X has no effect at all, let alone the intended or implied effect. However, I tried to implement the latter option, and it isn't working as expected and I don't yet know why. The port is setting BROKEN as I intend, but poudriere charges ahead, and tried to build dependencies destined to fail rather than refusing informatively. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-204594-21822-AwqECDiCeK>