From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 11:49:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C052A57 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (mail.turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d16:4514::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CF79FA0 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 379D91FE023; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:49:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <542E8D27.2060505@selasky.org> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 13:48:55 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel O'Connor , freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic in usb_unref_device References: <8B31CE4F-F310-49E7-8316-22D6170BF6C6@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <8B31CE4F-F310-49E7-8316-22D6170BF6C6@gsoft.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 11:49:02 -0000 On 10/03/14 13:19, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > Hi, > I have a custom USB device based on the Cypress FX2 and we are finding that with some older kernels it hangs - this was fixed in https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=267240 but now it panics with… > Hi, There's a minor bug there. Can you test the attached patch? --HPS